/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) language comprehension (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: language comprehension
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines494 - : Event Related Potentials (ERP) literature on semantic incongruity and N400 has shown that the meaning of a given critical word is constructed by integrating contextually available information. Numerous studies have been conducted in which different kinds of inconsistencies have generated N400 effects (^[45]Kutas & Federmeier, 2011). The N400 component, first reported by Kutas and Hillyard (1980a), is present as response when there is a meaningful element. This component is a negative ERP that starts around 250 ms after the onset of one incongruous stimulus, negatively peaking around 400 ms and most prominent in the central-parietal sites. In language comprehension, the amplitude of this component has been shown to be directly linked with the degree to which the context facilitates understanding of the meaning associated with the word through predictability, with a larger negativity when it is difficult to semantically integrate the target word, given a particular context (for a review, see
Evaluando al candidato language comprehension:
2) component: 3
language comprehension
Lengua: eng
Frec: 53
Docs: 29
Nombre propio: / 53 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.444 = ( + (1+2) / (1+5.75488750216347)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| language comprehension |
: Barres, V. & Lee, J. (2014). Template construction grammar: From visual scene description to language comprehension and agrammatism. Neuroinformatics, 12(1), 18-208. : Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59, 55-73. : Brouwer, H., Fitz, H. & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127-143. : Chwilla, D. J., Kolk, H. H. & Vissers, C. T. (2007). Immediate integration of novel meanings: N400 support for an embodied view of language comprehension. Brain Research, 1183, 109-123. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.014 : De Vega, M., Robertson, D., Glenberg, A., Kaschak, M. & Rinck, M. (2004). On doing two things at once: Temporal constraints on actions in language comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 32, 10331043. : DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P. & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature neuroscience, 8(8), 1117-1121. doi: 10.1038/nn1504 : Ferreira, F. & Patson, N. D. (2007). The 'good enough' approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71-83. : Gernsabcher, M. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. : Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M. & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304(5669), 438-441. doi: 10.1126/science.1095455 : Harris, J., Rogers, W. & Qualls, C. (1998). Written language comprehension in younger and older adults. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41, 603-617. : Just, M. & Carpenter, P. (1987). The Psychology of reading and language comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon. : Kronmüller, E. & Barr, D. J. (2015). Referential precedents in spoken language comprehension: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 1-19. : Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23-49. : Sanford, A. J. & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(9), 382-386. : Stothard, S. & Hulme, Ch. (1992). Reading comprehension difficulties in children. The role of language comprehension and working memory skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 245-246. : Trueswell, J. (2000). The organization and use of the lexicon for language comprehension. En B. Landau, J. Sabini, J. Jonidis & E. Newport (Eds.), Perception. cognition and language. Essays in honor of Henry and Lila Gleitman (pp. 327-345). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. : Zwaan, R. & Radvansky, (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin,123(2), 162-185. : Zwaan, R. (2003). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 35-62. : Zwaan, R. (2004). The inmersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. En B.H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 44 (pp. 3562). San Diego: Elsevier. : Zwaan, R. A. & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185. : Zwaan, R., Madden, C., Yaxley, R. & Aveyard, M. (2004). Moving words: Dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28, 611619. : Zwaan, R.A. & Radvansky, G.A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162-185. |